[BC] So, some consumers do care about audio quality...

[WFIFeng@aol.com]

In a message dated 12/08/2005 05:13:20 AM Eastern Standard Time, 
jerseyspikes at gmail.com writes:

> i dunno what these people are talking-- maybe its just my ears but for low
>  bitrate stuff I'll take AAC over mp3 any day.  I've used the encoder in
>  question  (LAME) to rip stuff for my ipod, and my AAC stuff still sounds
>  better.
>  

I use LAME to encode at 160Kbps, highest quality setting. It sounds 
positively wonderful. 160 is the best compromise (IMHO) between file size and audio 
quality. These ears can't tell the difference between 160K and WAV.

Willie...