[BC] So, some consumers do care about audio quality...

[Bernie Courtney]

Consider yourself lucky then.  Anything less then 256 i find terribly
aggravating, as least with the music that I listen to- mostly all dance
music with tons of synths and effects already in it that compression wreaks
havoc on.

bern

On 12/8/05, WFIFeng at aol.com <WFIFeng at aol.com> wrote:
>
>
> I use LAME to encode at 160Kbps, highest quality setting. It sounds
> positively wonderful. 160 is the best compromise (IMHO) between file size
> and audio
> quality. These ears can't tell the difference between 160K and WAV.
>
> Willie...
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
> http://www.radiolists.net/
>