[BC] AM Interference
Mike McCarthy
Towers
Fri Dec 16 08:56:23 CST 2005
It might be that the night time operation will occur when the analog
sunsets. At which point, most of the interference issues will be moot and
actually might allow many more non-class A stations to ditch their DA
arrays and go omni or to increase their night power. Some might even be
able to offer night service for the first time. WHY...because the D/U
ratios to the adjacent channels will all go out the window. Especially on
2nd and 3rd adjacent channels. You could almost co-locate stations only
two channels apart instead of the 4 channel spacing we have now.
I think THAT's where digital will shine in the eyes of the station owners.
But only when everyone goes digital and back to 10KHZ primary occupied
bandwidth.
I would be opposed to permitting new stations to come on as a result of the
reduced D/U ratios if they would have to go DA or would have overlapped
other stations if they were analog. But it would be my guess that there
would be a mad dash to the FCC to file 301's to eliminate DA's/increase
power/get night service and might be a moot point.
MM
At 09:41 AM 12/16/2005 -0500, Rich Wood wrote
>------ At 12:50 AM 12/16/2005, FrankGott at aol.com wrote: -------
>
>>There had been discussion on this list a few months ago about potential AM
>>interference from BPL services offered by power companies. Well, the power
>>company serving much of the Pittsburgh market is about to offer a BPL
>>service.
>
>We're assured BPL will be benign. No interference. I think it would be
>hypocritical to attack BPL when we appear willing to trash our own band
>with our own stations and IBUZ. As stations light up with it more and more
>adjacents will need 500Kw just to be local.
>
>It's interesting how we're basking in DX nostalgia just as DX is about to
>go away. At some point the FCC will have to authorize nighttime operation.
>If they don't, stations might as well become daytimers as far as ratings
>are concerned. Nighttime AM might not have huge ratings draw but every
>daypart contributes to overall numbers. To remove 12 hours a day would
>have quite an impact.
>
>Rich
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
>http://www.radiolists.net/
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list