[BC] Digital Interference (was AM Interference)
Robert Meuser
Robertm
Sun Dec 18 12:56:53 CST 2005
Rich Wood wrote:
>
> Why is WNYC-AM so difficult to receive in IBUZ? Didn't they increase
> power to 20Kw when they moved in with WMCA? Wouldn't the digital power
> be nearly comparable to WOR? Of course, I lived on the Hudson River at
> Horatio St. and received WNYC-AM and WMCA directly over Water. Very
> strong signals. According to Tom and Kerry at WOR, digital makes
> formerly unreceivable signals crystal clear. It should be very easy
> with a stationary receiver.
The signal is much weaker than the other stations. Maybe it is because
they are only 10 KW. I have to re-orienent the radio and then usually I
get the signal. Funny thing, the Receptor is not nearly as directional
on AM and is full quieting on virtually every local station. That
includes 1280, 1380, 1480 and 1600 as well as 1660. 1280 has the best
digital signal on the AM band in the market. NPR the worst WOR is
average and I base that against common processing practices on the FM
band - basically they process for the money side which is analog and
digital is along for the ride. In analog 1480 is by far the best
sounding station.
R
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list