[BC] IBOC

[Mike Gideon]

Bill,

You're talking like it hasn't already been decided. I'm lighting up a 3DX50 
next week, and the FCC's gonna let me do it. That will be my second AM this 
year, with several more coming next year.

The transition period has started. We NEED to be working on getting through 
it.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill Harms" <wharms at comcast.net>
To: "Broadcast Radio Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 7:13 PM
Subject: Re: [BC] IBOC


> Barry:
> I assume you mean the extended band 1610-1700 khz.  I think that would be
> a good idea and something that should be looked at more carefully.  I 
> understand
> about the expanded band being opened up before IBOC was introduced, but 
> this
> would have been a good opportunity if it would have started from the 
> ground floor.
>
> Bill Harms
>
> On 13 Jul 2005 at 17:01, Barry Mishkind wrote:
>
>>          ... or perhaps "re-write" the AM Stereo requirement
>>          for expanded band to IBOC?
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
> http://www.radiolists.net/