[BC] RE: IBOC
Tom Taggart
tpt
Fri Jul 15 07:59:52 CDT 2005
To the Congress over-the-air broadcast is a cesspool run by fat-cat
plutocrats, to be exploited for as much political and fiscal gain as
possible. To the bureaucrats, over-the air broadcasting is a dangerous
idea that should have never been allowed to grow as big as it has, because
it cannot be easily controlled..
Local broadcasters are only indirectly subject to Federal control of their
programing. Granted, extreme pornographic or otherwise offensive
programing may lead to fines, but the courts will protect them against any
regulation of political content. After a decade or so of Limbaugh, does
anyone think the Fairness Doctrine (if passed) would survive a court
challenge? The FCC has largely abandoned media scarcity in allocating
channels to communities, they are not going to be successful in arguing
this same media scarcity supports content regulations that would interfere
with political speech.
Despite criticism of off color programing by the major media groups, local
broadcasters still have Congressional constituencies, even in this day and
age, that will protect their interests against any egregious expansion of
Federal controls.
Hence, to the government bureaucrats, satellite is the wave of the future,
and not for reasons you might think:
1. Satellite broadcasters require Federal government approval to continue
their activities, the service is not mature enough for an "expectancy of
renewal of their license;
2. All programming is funneled through one central location (New York or
Washington) that is easily monitored and controlled;
3. As national services, satellite broadcasters do not have any
politically powerful local constituencies to challenge or otherwise
interfere with Federal control;
Therefore:
1. Being a subscription service, the FCC can avoid calls for regulation
of sexual and language content on DAB; on the other hand, DAB?s dependency
upon Federal favors becomes an invisible hand regulating raunchy content;
2. Being entirely dependent upon the grant of further permission to
develop their secret terrestrial repeaters, the satellite services are
easily controlled in terms of political content;
3. Having just two uplink centers, their facilities are easily
commandeered in case of the imminent break-out of war or uncontrolled
democracy.
So why should the Congress and Federal government care about technical
improvements to either AM or FM bands? IBOC is a toy for the big boys to
play with, there is no politcal pressure to create a workable digital
system for terrestrial broadcasting outside of the existing broadcast
bands.
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list