[BC] Re: No-code Amateur license

[Mike McCarthy]

PRB-1 only applies to Part 97.  Nothing else.

MM

> I once heard that broadcasters have an even harder time putting up 
antennas 
> because they DON'T have PRB-1.
> 
> Rob Atkinson
> 
> 
> (note the attempt at a broadcasting slant on this topic.)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> From: Rich Wood <richwood at pobox.com>
> Reply-To: Broadcast Radio Mailing List <broadcast at radiolists.net>
> To: Broadcast Radio Mailing List <broadcast at radiolists.net>
> Subject: Re: [BC] Re: No-code Amateur license
> Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 12:43:09 -0400
> 
> ------ At 10:33 AM 7/25/2005, R J Carpenter wrote: -------
> 
> >The code isn't the only thing discouraging new hams.  In my county*,
> >AFAIK no subdivision started within the past 40 years allows 
antennas.
> 
> What happened to PRB-1 that was supposed to allow "reasonable" ham 
antennas? 
> I also think recent legislation prevents a developer from 
prohibiting dish 
> antennas.
> 
> Rich
> KF2JO
> 
> _________________________________________________________________
> Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today - it's 
FREE! 
> http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
http://www.radiolists.net/
> 

Reply to <towers at mre.com>
>From my traveling acount...