[BC] Your site in view

[Robert Meuser]

WFIFeng at aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 05/09/2005 3:57:29 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
> robertm at broadcast.net writes:
> 
> 
>>That is not the case. Each case is different and you have to look at the 
>>engineering. 
> 
> 
> Of course.
> 
> 
>> Anyway, what is wrong with interference over land?  Deals have been made 
>>over interference for ages.
> 
> 
> Well, if that land is mostly uninhabitable desert, rocks, swamp, or 
> mountains, sure. :) Don't the Great Lakes have some pretty major population centers 
> dotted along their shores?
> 
   Who cares?