[BC] Charge Dissipation Devices
Robert Meuser
Robertm
Wed May 11 01:44:27 CDT 2005
There is indeed current flowing. I know of one system where those currents were
used to pre-start a generator so the plant was on standby power before a storm
affected the power grid.
R
Mario Hieb, P.E. wrote:
> Does anyone have test data on these devices?
>
> If charge is actually dissipated, a current flows and this should be
> measurable.
>
>
> Mario
>
>
>
> At 11:01 PM 5/10/2005, you wrote:
>
>> Message: 11
>> Date: Tue, 10 May 2005 20:07:57 -0400
>> From: "Bruce Doerle" <bdoerle at mail.ucf.edu>
>> Subject: [BC] Lightning Prevention?????
>> To: <broadcast at radiolists.net>
>> Cc: dwhitehair at WI.RR.COM
>> Message-ID: <s2811438.086 at mail.ucf.edu>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
>>
>> Fellow broadcasters,
>>
>> Last week there was a brief debate on the merits of Charge Dissipation
>> Devices (ie lightning prevention or avoidance systems). The debate
>> started in response to a message from Mr. Dana Whitehair of KUT,
>> University of Texas. Mr. Whitehair's message, mine, and others are
>> shown below this initial paragraph grouping.
>>
>> Of course, this raised some hairs on the manufacturer's of these
>> products and number of messages took place in public and behind the
>> scenes. The end product of these messages attacked me and eluded to
>> testimonials as evidence that their products work. Most engineers and
>> scientist know that CTS and ESE products do not work; they have not
>> been endorsed by any professional scientific, regulatory, or standards
>> body. The manufacturers offer no scientific proof of their theories
>> and claim their products performance by using testimonials as evidence
>> that the product works. However, there is a significant fault in this
>> logic. The testimonials are from unknowing persons who lack the
>> knowledge to understand this questionable, unproven technology.
>>
>> My issue in this message is to open a debate on the merits of CTS
>> (protection / avoidance) technology. Lightning is an issue that most
>> broadcast must deal with and how you deal with it will determine the
>> safety and reliability issues of your broadcast site. I do not
>> believe that the claims made by CTS vendors is clearly understood in
>> our broadcast community, and I would like to open this issue up for
>> discussion. I invite all interest parties to participate. I
>> encourage you to read the messages below to understand with who you
>> are dealing.
>>
>> Regards,
>>
>> Bruce
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Mario Hieb, P.E.
> Consulting Engineer
>
> 36 H St. #2
> Salt Lake City, UT 84103
>
> e-mail: mario at xmission.com
> text: 8015546069 at mmode.com
> cell: 801-554-6069
>
> NSPE ~ AFCCE ~ SBE
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
> http://www.radiolists.net/
>
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list