[BC] Re: Super Modulation Ruling

[Phil Alexander]

On 12 May 2005 at 7:40, DHultsman5 at aol.com wrote:

 
> What do you remember and why was 125% chosen?

I have a vague recollection of some engineering fig leaf
about linearity, but 125 was a number that most boxes
COULD do, and it's a level that gives very little
advantage in terms of audio to noise, thus the established
order was not upset by coverage changes.

Phil Alexander, CSRE 
Broadcast Engineering Services and Technology 
(a Div. of Advanced Parts Corporation) 
Ph. (317) 335-2065   FAX (317) 335-9037




-- 
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus.
Version: 7.0.308 / Virus Database: 266.11.8 - Release Date: 5/10/05