[BC] SBE

[Ron Castro]

The FCC did blow it badly on that call.

I don't know about the rest of you, but I'm getting deluged with PCN's for 
systems that are many channels and hundreds of miles away and not pointed 
toward any of my paths.

Ron Castro
Chief Technical Officer
Results Radio, LLC


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Jerry Mathis" <thebeaver32 at hotmail.com>
To: <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Sent: Thursday, May 12, 2005 1:46 PM
Subject: Re: [BC] SBE


> And when we do speak, they don't listen. Two words: Frequency 
> coordination.
>
>
>
> Jerry Mathis
> Clear Channel Radio, Tupelo & Meridian MS
>
>
>
>
>>From: Alan Alsobrook <radiotech at bellsouth.net>
>>Reply-To: Broadcast Radio Mailing List <broadcast at radiolists.net>
>>To: Broadcast Radio Mailing List <broadcast at radiolists.net>
>>Subject: Re: [BC] SBE
>>Date: Thu, 12 May 2005 07:15:20 -0700
>>
>>All the time I see people on this list saying something along the lines of 
>>"if the FCC would listen to the engineers"  Well if we the engineers don't 
>>say something how can they even have the opportunity to listen?
>>
>>Mario Hieb, P.E. wrote:
>>
>>>Perhaps somebody on this list can explain to me why SBE is spending so 
>>>much time (and member dues) on FCC related issues. How many SBE members 
>>>own station licenses? Isn't this the sort of thing that the NAB, and not 
>>>SBE, should be doing? Or are NAB and SBE one and the same today??
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>>To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>>For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
>>http://www.radiolists.net/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
> http://www.radiolists.net/
>
>