[BC] Conductivity vs Skywave

[Richard Fry]

Peter Haas (edited clip):
> WLS wisely (perhaps over a half-century ago) sited its Tx in an area of
> relatively higher conductivity...The other Chicago Class I-As sited
> themselves ...in an area of relatively lower ground conductivity.
> Now, WLS..always had excellent secondary service to the West Coast,
> whereas the other Chicago Class I-As...had poor secondary service
> to the West Coast, IMO.
________________

If this effect is not limited to the Chicago As, one would expect those at 
sites with poor conductivity such as KDKA, WSB, WSM, WRVA and the NY/NJ/New 
England Class As to have poor secondary service compared to Class As at 
sites with good conductivity such as WHO, WBAP, KMOX etc.  This doesn't seem 
to be demonstrated by experience, though (IMO).

RF