[BC] W-H-A-M and sequential-ness
Barry Mishkind
barry
Fri May 20 14:59:16 CDT 2005
At 12:41 PM 5/20/2005, Scott Fybush wrote
>WHAM was not a sequential assignment, either.
You may not want to state that as a fact.
>Eastman liked catchy names (like, for instance, "Kodak"), and he thought
>"WHAM" would be a nifty thing to call a radio station, and so it has been
>from July 11, 1922 until now.
That may be true, but most of the WHAx calls
were issued sequentially in July 1922, starting with
WHAA on June 26, 1922, and ending with WHAZ on
July 18th.
The WIAx series also went in July 1922, and
many of the WJAx series..
_______________________________________________________________________
Barry Mishkind - Tucson, AZ - 520-296-3797
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list