[BC] Jack Format

[Mike McCarthy]

I would not say that in the least.In some areas, it's the format of choice 
because of the listeners fatigue of 300 song rotation playlists.  Many 
stations here reacted to our "We Play Anything" (SM) format...which did 
just that. Bottom line...it's better to create reaction than react.

MM

At 05:14 PM 5/20/2005 -0700, you wrote:
>It's now the 'format of last resort'.
>
>Ron Castro
>Chief Technical Officer
>Results Radio, LLC
>
>
>----- Original Message ----- From: <WFIFeng at aol.com>
>To: <broadcast at radiolists.net>
>Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 2:34 PM
>Subject: Re: [BC] Jack Format
>
>
>>In a message dated 05/20/2005 11:29:15 AM Eastern Daylight Time,
>>david at davidgleason.com writes:
>>
>>>Most of them have no announcers at all, live or voicetracked. Just recorded
>>>  drops. The format is a reaction to dislike for jocks and talk on music
>>>  stations.
>>
>>Wait a sec... I thought it was a response to "Shuffle" on iPods? <:/
>>
>>"All trainwrecks, all the time! We're 'JACK' Radio!"
>>
>>Willie...
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>>To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>>For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
>>http://www.radiolists.net/
>>
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
>http://www.radiolists.net/