[BC] Inexpensive exciter

[Mark W. Croom]

----- Original Message ----- 
From: <khcs at juno.com>
To: <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Sent: Monday, May 23, 2005 11:46 AM
Subject: Re: [BC] Inexpensive exciter


>
> Mark observed:
>
>>I just retired a 695 in favor of an FX-50, and the difference in 
>>modulation control and what we can run on the low end is amazing.
>
> The 695 was a fine exciter for its day, but its day as a main is probably 
> over.
>
> -----------
>
> I won't argue with you there, but remember, the goal was to find something 
> cheap.  And the QEI is still probably better than a Ramsey.
>
>
> Glen Kippel
> KHCS
> Palm Desert, CA

Nor would I argue with you on the Ramsey assessment.

The 695 at KJLY remains my backup, and I'm glad to have removed it from 
daily service before the thing wiped out on me.

Mark
MN