[BC] IBUZ vs. iBuzz

Rich Wood richwood
Thu Nov 17 10:40:17 CST 2005


------ At 09:27 AM 11/17/2005, DHultsman5 at aol.com wrote: -------

>Note Batteries are  not included due to the high drain on the  batteries.  I
>heard the chips draw alot of current.

That's bad marketing. I'm sure they fly off the shelves so battery 
shelf-life would be good. Also, the iBuzz battery is used for short 
periods to accomplish its mission, compared with IBUZ which is 
expected to stimulate the listener for hours at a time. For iBuzz TSL 
- Time Spent Lusting - is short.  Come to think about it , the 
interference will cause IBUZ TSL - Time Spent Listening - to be 
equally short. Why can iBuzz be portable and IBUZ can't. Maybe iBorg 
needs some design lessons.

Rich 



More information about the Broadcast mailing list