[BC] IBUZ vs. iBuzz
Rich Wood
richwood
Thu Nov 17 10:40:17 CST 2005
------ At 09:27 AM 11/17/2005, DHultsman5 at aol.com wrote: -------
>Note Batteries are not included due to the high drain on the batteries. I
>heard the chips draw alot of current.
That's bad marketing. I'm sure they fly off the shelves so battery
shelf-life would be good. Also, the iBuzz battery is used for short
periods to accomplish its mission, compared with IBUZ which is
expected to stimulate the listener for hours at a time. For iBuzz TSL
- Time Spent Lusting - is short. Come to think about it , the
interference will cause IBUZ TSL - Time Spent Listening - to be
equally short. Why can iBuzz be portable and IBUZ can't. Maybe iBorg
needs some design lessons.
Rich
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list