[BC] Password Generator
Bill Brister
bbrister
Tue Feb 14 11:12:42 CST 2006
I may be more diligent than most but I did keep a separate paper file with
all my passwords written on it. It has close to 50 passwords. I never even
tried to remember a password. I realize that files can be stolen or
otherwise accessed but what can you do? I kept the list as secure as
possible.
I can't imagine someone generating a complicated password, using it one
time, then not storing it in some manner in order to remember it.
Bill B.
Houston, TX
-----Original Message-----
From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
[mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Cowboy
Sent: Tuesday, February 14, 2006 8:09 AM
To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
Subject: Re: [BC] Password Generator
On Monday 13 February 2006 10:44 pm, Sherrod Munday wrote:
>On Monday 13 February 2006 11:55, Bill Brister wrote:
>> You can get a small program free for the download that generates
passwords
>> like this. Its at www.quickysoftware.com. I used it for a long time until
I
>> purchased RoboForm which has a built in password generator.
>
>Or, you can use the rand() function in many spreadsheet programs to
generate a
>random number (usually between zero and one).
//snip//
The big problem with generating passwords in this fashion, is that it's not
a word, difficult to remember, and tends to end up as a post-it on the
machine
to which it applies. That's about as good as no password at all.
If these are used as totally automated passwords for some purpose, then
a back door is necessary in case one of those machines fails, and the
password needs to be reset, which kinda defeats the purpose of these
"passwords" in the first place.
It's my opinion and practice to generate passwords based on some easily
remembered phrase, like every fifth letter of a favorite book title, with
appropriately placed capitalizations, and preferably including characters
that Micro$oft deems "illegal" in a password, and until VERY recently,
simply
a few more characters than Micro$oft would allow, would provide security
against 99% of the crackers out there anyway !
Real security is not an easy thing. This is why we can expect to see more
retinal scanners, implanted chips and the like.
( though the 1024 bit PGP type keys used by ssh are pretty good ! )
What truly amazes me, are the number of systems out there where I still
find that the password is either "password" or "Password" !!
Of course, if I have physical access to the machine in question, then the
whole question of passwords it moot, except in the case of encrypted
files and/or file systems.
That's why at one sometimes client, it takes two authorizations from two
already authorized people to get past the two armed security guards just
to use the physical key ( which the guards do not have ) to gain access
to the system console, where one can then enter a password.
Obviously, that's not a broadcast client !
;-)
--
Cowboy
http://cowboys.homeip.net
Experience varies directly with equipment ruined.
_______________________________________________
This is the BROADCAST mailing list
To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
http://www.radiolists.net/
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list