[BC] Radio's computerized future?
Robert Meuser
Robertm
Thu Feb 16 21:09:57 CST 2006
Kirk:
I certainly have no argument over RJ 45's BUT why in the world did you ever
solder D Subs???? We always used the crimp version and there was never a problem.
R
Kirk Harnack wrote:
> WFIFeng at aol.com wrote:
>
>>
>> The only thing I find a little puzzling, is the choice of RJ45 jacks
>> for the analog I/O on the rack unit... I'd think XLR would be
>> better... but then, I'm just a "horse & buggy" kind'a guy, who's still
>> learning all this newfangled stuff. ;)
>
>
> Willie,
>
> I'll take credit or blame for Axia gear having RF-45's for audio -
> analog or AES.
>
> The original Axia nodes used Dsub-9 connectors. YUCCHHH! Have you
> EVER soldered one of those neatly? I never have.
>
> We discussed RJ-45's quite a lot with Dan Braverman at Radio Systems.
> His StudioHub system had been out for several years with an excellent
> track record for ease of installation and reliable connections. So,
> after a few hundred e-mails back and forth with Axia R&D guys, me and a
> couple of others chiming in, we decided that the RJ-45, using the
> StudioHub de facto wiring standard, was the way to go.
>
> Here's an source of some quick info on that system, specific to Axia...
> http://www.studiohub.com/axia/
>
> Best regards,
>
> Kirk Harnack
> Telos/Omnia/Axia
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
> http://www.radiolists.net/
>
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list