[BC] The first 3 dB...

[Robert Meuser]

Look at the frequencies of computer and the associated LANS. We are 
talking about UHF, weren't we?


Burt I. Weiner wrote:

> The noise figures of most UHF TV receivers is (worse) well above the 
> background noise level of most of the UHF spectrum.  We were talking 
> about UHF television spectrum, weren't we?
>
> Burt
>
> At 10:31 AM 2/18/2006, you wrote:
>
>> From: Robert Meuser <Robertm at broadcast.net>
>> Subject: Re: [BC] 3 dB improvement...
>> To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
>> Message-ID: <43F74230.6050107 at broadcast.net>
>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>>
>> That's not the point.  That first 3 db needs to come from the noise 
>> floor.
>> Eliminate electricity???
>>
>>
>> R
>>
>> Burt I. Weiner wrote:
>> > Most UHF TV receiver front ends are pretty basic.  Some currently
>> > manufactured set still go directly into a mixer without a RF stage 
>> ahead
>> > of the mixer.  Low noise, wide dynamic range devices for the UHF
>> > frequencies are pretty inexpensive.  Consider the front end of cell
>> > phones at 900+ MHz.  Throw away stuffs.  I would never suggest a 
>> decent
>> > antenna as most consumers just want to plug it in, twiddle the loop
>> > antenna and watch - a fact of life.  A 3 dB front end improvement 
>> would
>> > actually be pretty simple since this would be the first 3 dB and 
>> not the
>> > last 3 dB.
>> >
>> > Burt
>
>
> Burt I. Weiner Associates
> Broadcast Technical Services
> Glendale, California  U.S.A.
> biwa at earthlink.net
> K6OQK
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
> http://www.radiolists.net/
>