[BC] Trapezoidal modulation display (was "Re: [BC] Inovonicsmodel 520")

Sun Feb 19 10:07:36 CST 2006

It was WEAM 1390kHz, Ed Buterbaugh was the C.E. and it was LOUD!

-----Original Message-----
From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
[mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Lamar Owen
Sent: Saturday, February 18, 2006 8:53 AM
To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
Subject: Re: [BC] Trapezoidal modulation display (was "Re: [BC]
Inovonicsmodel 520")

On Saturday 04 February 2006 18:45, Phil Alexander wrote:
> On 1 Feb 2006 at 19:33, Alan Alsobrook wrote:
> > You should use sample of the audio being applied to the input terminals
> > of the transmitter.

> That depends on the linearity of the modulator. "Back in the day" when
> such things were less dependable, we would tap a blocking cap on the
> top side of the modulation reactor and feed a big voltage divider with
> it. Thus, you had a pure analog of the B+ going to the PA driving the
> H plates of the CRT and we used a pick up coil in the tank compartment
> or a tap off the mod. monitor sample for driving the V plates. See,
> those were the days when most scopes had jumpers on the back so you
> could drive the deflection plates of a CRT directly. Just remove the
> jumper from the V amp and sweep output and put enough voltage to get
> a screen filling pattern.

John Randolph (W4QA, SK) told me back in 1992 about this display.  The few 
months I was graced with his advice are golden to me; he died in December of

1992 from a heart attack suffered why working at WSKY in Asheville, NC.  I 
participated in the estate sale a few months later, and got some equipment 
and mementos from the sale; some items are priceless, some I've sold.

He had an old Tektronix rack mount that was gutted, with a series blocking
cap 
and direct plate drive, just for this purpose.  Directly viewing the 
modulated high voltage at the PA plate, to check for PA linearity; comparing

with a trace of the various intermediate audio stages to find AF 
nonlinearities.  The Tek might have had a pair of high voltage pots to
adjust 
sweep size; don't remember.

> When monitoring glowing tubes, one was fortunate to get much more than
> 100% positive mod., although there was no limit to the + allowed. In
> fact, the rules called for a minimum capability of 85%.

John also told me about the 10kW rigs ran at 5k to get 250% positive peaks, 
back in the day, in Washington, DC.  Perhaps the call sign was WEEM, or
WEAM.

-- 
Lamar Owen
Director of Information Technology
Pisgah Astronomical Research Institute
1 PARI Drive
Rosman, NC  28772
(828)862-5554
www.pari.edu

_______________________________________________
This is the BROADCAST mailing list
To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
http://www.radiolists.net/

-- 
----------------------------------------
I am using the free version of SPAMfighter for private users.
It has removed 88 spam emails to date.
Paying users do not have this message in their emails.
Try www.SPAMfighter.com for free now!