[BC] I'net intrusive ads (WAS:WOLF-FM/ )

[WFIFeng@aol.com]

In a message dated 02/26/2006 11:53:45 PM Eastern Standard Time, 
barry at oldradio.com writes:

>          But perhaps the listeners want it from
>           your signal. They may not be able
>           to hear the other one.

This is true, especially in Bridgeport, Stratford, and Trumbull, where it 
*used to be listenable* but is now completely jammed-out by a translator of a 
Class D in Danbury.

Still, our short Daytime-Only hours hinder us in many ways.

>           You stopped short. Read on. Verses 15-18

I stopped short on purpose, since those verses apply directly and 
specifically to the Apostle Paul, himself.

>           So, if you were light on money, you would
>           take the "offensive" cab, knowing???

Absolutely not. I would take a bus, a subway, or hail a different cab.

>           It is not that far from wanting all software
>           to do what you want ... without cost.

I dont' see how, especially with the explosive growth and quality of OSS 
these days!

(OSS= Open Source Software)

>           but think of all the listeners who would
>           call and complain that if you were not
>           rehired, they would stop listening.....

In one's *dreams*, maybe! ;)

>            But if you are not running commercials,
>            the ASCAP is cheap.

I can only assume you mean this in the sense of being a non-comm station, as 
opposed to a comm, that simply isn't selling massive amounts of spots?

>           Sort of like the banner on the audio feed
>           you were complaining about???

*I* wasn't the one complaining about that. I was quoting the *original 
poster*, who was complaining about it. *I* was complaining about the sites that 
override a users' preferences. Whole 'nuther topic, there. :) (And it is now moot, 
since I use FireFox.)

Willie...