[BC] Shulke's Black Box
DHultsman5@aol.com
DHultsman5
Tue Jul 4 08:09:38 CDT 2006
In a message dated 7/3/2006 9:08:23 PM Central Daylight Time,
richwood at pobox.com writes:
That'll be tough. Even Jim's Black Box is no match for those digital
artifacts. The wire used was analog.
&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&
The transient and peak response of analogue wire vs. that of oxygen free
digital wire is really worth the extra bucks I have been told. ??
I will say that Irv Joel, after Cox bought Schulke, was involved in many of
Cox Radio's radio purchases. A station was purchasing a 10 kW. AM
transmitter from us and the one stipulation was that we had to get rid of the Peerless
input transformer in the audio input to the box.
The sales guys had been trying to get this changed at for some time since
both the "Power Rock" and the 317C-2, 50 kW. already had differential inputs.
What we had been trying to change for a few years got changed in the product
when Cox sent in the formal request with an order.
I recall many station engineers telling me they had to modify their consoles
to remove any of the cheap balancing transformers on the their consoles to
solve the problem of core saturation on audio peaks in the transformers.
Probably the one thing a Schulke station did was to point out that FM could
once again have a good technical sound, that reproduced the music without all
the artifacts of heavy processing and clipping and still remain commerically
salable.
I recall a good friend of mine that after he received a new 8200 one year
programmed it for no processing except for peak limiting on December 25th each
year. He was once again amazed at how well the station sounded, on the 24
hours of Christmas, with minimal processing. He ran a couple of Schulke
stations at one time.
Dave
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list