[BC] GE Superadio III vs. IBOC hash
Steve
shnewman
Wed Jul 5 08:26:10 CDT 2006
It would if it worked. I remember when I first heard about using digital
technology on AM and I was very excited about it. This is not the system if
it splatters four stations on either side. <g> So, I exaggerated a little.
Steve Newman
Steve Walker Productions
Opp, AL 36467
----- Original Message -----
From: "Bill Harms" <wharms at philcobill.com>
To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 3:16 AM
Subject: Re: [BC] GE Superadio III vs. IBOC hash
> Actually, my wide band radios work just fine on the AM band as it is
> right now. Digital radio would render them pretty much uselss. I am
> not so sure that digital radio would be an improvement for the AM
> band.
>
> Bill Harms
> Elkridge, Maryland
>
> On 5 Jul 2006 at 0:26, Robert Meuser wrote:
>
>> The problem with your statement is the the FCC or its predecessor set up
>> an unrealistic allocation system that has been further politically
>> corrupted over time. Wideband radios do NOT work in today's practical
>> broadcast environment. This is a sad but true fact, except that we CAN
>> employ some form of digital that will drastically improve the band and
>> move radio into a new dimension.
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
> http://www.radiolists.net/
>
>
> --
> No virus found in this incoming message.
> Checked by AVG Free Edition.
> Version: 7.1.394 / Virus Database: 268.9.9/382 - Release Date: 7/4/2006
>
>
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list