[BC] Modualtion Monitors (do we need them?)
Jerry Mathis
thebeaver32
Tue Jul 18 13:09:46 CDT 2006
None. All Harris transmitters (two SX-1's, one Gates 1, I think).
On 7/18/06, Bailey, Scott <SBailey at nespower.com> wrote:
>
> Jerry,
> I have a Fluke, Pocket Scope" to see modulation. Oh by the way, how
> many AM's do you take care of that use the BE AM1A. That has some kind
> of mod meter on it.
>
> Scott
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
> [mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of Jerry Mathis
> Sent: Tuesday, July 18, 2006 12:33 PM
> To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
> Subject: Re: [BC] Modualtion Monitors (do we need them?)
>
> On 7/18/06, Bailey, Scott <SBailey at nespower.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> > To the group:
> >
> > How many of you, (excluding the big Class A stations) that take
> care
> > of stand alone AM's, have or use a modulation monitor? In a previous
> > conversation with Dennis at KKTY on this list, he made mention he
> > doesn't use one. He relies on his Orban 9300 to take care of not over
> > modulating.
> > My Armstrong, X-1000B, AM Transmitter is set where it will not
> > exceed 90% in negative peaks. Positive peaks can be set with my Omnia
> 3,
> > and if you set the positive peaks at 125%, that's what it will do, no
> > its ands or buts with the Omnia 3.
> > I know the BE boxes have a little audio/modulation meter on them
> > built in and that's cool. I've seen some small AM's with newer
> > transmitters and processors, using no mod monitors, since they are no
> > longer required. I have a pocket fluke scope, if I really need to see
> > modulation.
> > I figured since modulation monitors are no longer required, that may
> > the reason I can't sell my Inovonics 520 mod monitor!
> >
> > Scott
> >
>
>
> I have them sitting around at various stations I take care of, all of
> them
> out of service. I'd like to fix them up, if I can find the time. To me,
> they're a quick check of how much the station in modulating. Better than
> lugging a 'scope around with me (and I don't have one of them, anyway).
> --
> JM
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
> http://www.radiolists.net/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
> http://www.radiolists.net/
>
--
JM
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list