[BC] Mod Monitors...
Burt I. Weiner
biwa
Wed Jul 19 20:46:10 CDT 2006
I think I may not have made my point very well.
Yes, it's true that you are not required to have a modulation
monitor. The rule requiring that you have one was dropped some time
ago but you are still continuously responsible for compliance.
Many times I've used a scope to set up a station's modulation when no
monitor was available and there was a question about modulation
levels. Any decent oscilloscope will certainly tell you if you are
cutting carrier. The problem comes when you try and set your positive
peaks to the legal maximum of 125%. If you have a scope with a peak
reading digital display indication then you can probably come pretty
close depending on how well you calibrate for a zero modulated
carrier.
What I have done when it has been necessary to look at positive peaks
with a scope is to calibrate +/- two major divisions for carrier
without any modulation, turn the horizontal sweep off and move the
remaining vertical trace just next to the center vertical reference
graticule on the screen. Momentarily kill the input and make sure the
spot is right on the center horizontal reference line, This gives me
the best way to visually look at peak positive modulation using an
oscilloscope. Each minor mark above carrier reference is 20%
modulation. One major division above carrier is 100% modulation and
one minor division above that would be 120%. The problem is, how well
did you calibrate and how well can you resolve the trace. How good is
the focus and astigmatism of the spot. You may think this is nit
picking but my comments personally come from desiring accuracy. I
highly recommend to my clients that they maintain a properly
calibrated modulation monitor. It's good, responsible engineering.
The issue may very well come home to roost if there is ever an issue
with the FCC over your modulation levels.
Burt
At 11:30 AM 7/19/2006, you wrote:
From: "Bailey, Scott&quo Subject: RE: [BC] Speedometers on Cars. Do we need them?...
To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Message-ID:
<50E0246CCF92B64BA1BA4EB56C09CBF005039C1C at bluepost.nes.nespower.nes
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Dennis,
There is nothing against having a mod monitor, but the
commission
doesn't require it and a good scope I think is the best. I know of
one
station that the commission came to inspect in this area. The
station
has no mod monitor at the studio, nor transmitter site. It was a
500
watt AM. They walked in the transmitter site, took a look at the
bar
graph on the BE transmitter, looked at the meter readings, then
left. No
question came up about a mod monitor.
Scott
When I bought my stations 11 years ago, neither the AM nor the FM
had
mod
monitors. Several good engineers and an FCC Field Inspector have
been
through my plant. Nobody's ever indicated that I need to have
seperate
mod
monitors in place. The Optimod on the AM and the exciter on my FM
have
pretty-colored Bouncy Bars, so I use them.
As a small-market owner/operator, the money comes directly out of
my
pocket,
and I've not spent it there. I have, however, spent the money on a
new
Nautel to replace an old RCA, and trenched and pvc'd about 400 feet
of
new
coax out to the tower. Not afraid to spend money when I have to,
but
can't
waste it, either.
Dennis Switzer
KKTY AM/FM
Douglas, WY
----- Original Message -----
From: "Burt I. Weiner"
Sent: Wednesday, July 19, 2006 12:15 AM
Subject: [BC] Speedometers on Cars. Do we need them?...
> I don't think we speedometers in our cars either. I rely on my
> carburetor to not make my car go to fast.
>
> Burt
Burt I. Weiner Associates
Broadcast Technical Services
Glendale, California U.S.A.
biwa at earthlink.net
K6OQK
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list