[BC] DA Bandwidth

[Robert Meuser]

Quite correct, Mike

The treaty only forbids certain insane contour overlaps of city grade 
signals.

R



Mike McCarthy wrote:

> I am aware of one in the SD and LA area which involves some heavy 
> hitters.  Stay tuned...
>
> The treaty with Mexico and Canada doesn't deal with IX from adjacent 
> channels placing willful emissions on the foreign station's channel.  
> Treaty simply states the IX shall not occur inside the home country.  
> So Mexican stations are being stomped on by US stations in the area 
> where HUGE overlaps already existed.  Canadian stations might suffer 
> the same fate to some extent.  Especially in the Vancouver, Toronto, 
> Montreal, Detroit, and Buffalo areas which have lots of cross boarder 
> signals.
>
> MM
>
> At 06:57 AM 6/1/2006 -0400, Tom Taggart wrote
>
>> Preparing the Canadian response Barry?
>>
>> I suspect full time IBAC would involve some treaty violations 
>> somewhere, somehow.
>> -- 
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
>> http://www.radiolists.net/
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
> http://www.radiolists.net/
>