[BC] 5.8 Ghz STL's

[Bill Spry]

They claim that it is because it is a new NLOS (non-line of site) system 
with about 7 different modulation schemes.  Though my point to point IS line 
of site.  Their study software shows 99.99993 %


Best Regards,

William J. Spry



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Mike McCarthy" <Towers at mre.com>
To: "Broadcasters' Mailing List" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 06, 2006 7:38 PM
Subject: Re: [BC] 5.8 Ghz STL's


> 30 miles at 5.8 Ghz is simply not tenable for 99.99% operation if there is 
> snow in the path.
>
> MM
>
> At 04:28 PM 6/6/2006 -0500, Danny Ray Boyer wrote
>>My advise would be don't believe everything your read.
>>
>>Contact me off list for additional information.
>>
>>Danny Ray Boyer
>>
>>We are searching for a reliable STL option using Spread Spectrum.  I read 
>>about the Gemini Lite (22 mbs bandwidth) wireless bridge system from 
>>Motorola (who now owns it).  We are going to be shooting a link from 30 
>>miles.  Just wondering if anyone has any real world experience with this 
>>system (before we spend the money).  The Gemini system makes claims of 124 
>>miles so I would think 30 miles would be cake.
>>
>>
>>
>>Best Regards,
>>
>>William J. Spry
>>
>>
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>>To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>>For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
>>http://www.radiolists.net/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
> http://www.radiolists.net/