[BC] barry at oldradio.com

[Robert Orban]

I would prefer more than one digest per day. If I am participating in a 
thread, a full day of delay is longer than I would like.

At 08:11 AM 6/8/2006, you wrote:
>From: Barry Mishkind <barry at oldradio.com>
>Subject: [BC] Digest Readers, Please Note
>To: broadcast at radiolists.net
>Message-ID: <7.0.1.0.2.20060608065627.01171190 at cox.net>
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
>
>As you know, the Digest summarizes the posts to BROADCAST when we get
>around 30 kB or so of messages.
>
>A couple of digest readers have mentioned to me that they have been
>seeing three and four digests on some days and that this puts a
>strain on their "inbox."  (While my "income" is around 650 emails a
>day, on average, and three or four emails don't even "measure" here,
>I want to be as sympathetic as possible. )
>
>Others have commented that spacing the Digests out is good because
>they don't have to wait a whole day for "some" of the posts.
>
>In order to gauge demand, I am asking, if you are a Digest reader, to
>send me a brief note with your preference.
>
>          1. would you prefer all the messages in one BIG Digest?
>          2. would you prefer the system to stay as it is?
>
>To reduce the load on the list, please send to
>barry at oldradio.com    If you merely hit "reply" it will bounce.