[BC] FAA RF rulemaking
Richard Fry
rfry
Wed Jun 28 08:02:24 CDT 2006
>In these cases, there were emissions which were not compliant
>with existing rules. So I fail to see why the FAA's shorts are all
> in a bind. The rules are already in place.
____________
Wasn't the big problem that the FAA wanted (wants) to apply lower limits on
radiated fields than required by the FCC?
IIRC, the FAA also assumed that the radiation pattern of the broadcast
antenna was the same for harmonics and spurious signals as for the
fundamental (which it is not), and may even have assumed it was all
isotropic.
RF
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list