[BC] Smallest AM Radiator
Bailey, Scott
SBailey
Thu Jun 29 08:11:30 CDT 2006
Peter,
Top loading....now that is the answer so some of the AM problems of
fighting tower restrictions. I have found that most city/county zoning
officials don't object to anything 100' or less. This is good for
non-directionals, especially Class C's.
Now that's the reason why I think there should be a rule making for
Class D's to be able to have the same minimum efficiency as Class C's,
241 mv/m.
Scott
-----Original Message-----
From: broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net
[mailto:broadcast-bounces at radiolists.net] On Behalf Of PeterH5322
Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 3:43 PM
To: Broadcasters' Mailing List
Subject: Re: [BC] Smallest AM Radiator
>I have a question, which station has, or using the smallest, vertical,
>AM Radiator in the US, excluding Valcom or Kinstar Antennas. The
>smallest I think is at KLID-AM in Pine Bluff, MO. It's a Class IV
(Class
>C) at 1340. I was having a debate with someone on this topic the other
>day. I think KLID's radiator/tower is only 100'.
Smallest conforming radiator is probably 45 degrees on a Class C
frequency, or 60 degrees on a Class C/D frequency.
As the highest Class C frequency is 1490, 45 degrees would be roughly 80
feet.
As the highest Class B/D frequency is 1700, 60 degrees would be roughly
95 feet.
One could easily add about 20 degrees of top-loading with very little
additional cost, thereby making 45 degrees into 65 degrees, and 60
degrees into 80 degrees, respectively.
_______________________________________________
This is the BROADCAST mailing list
To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
http://www.radiolists.net/
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list