[BC] City of Dallas & WRR

[DHultsman5@aol.com]

In a message dated 6/29/2006 6:48:21 PM Central Daylight Time,  
shnewman at alaweb.com writes:

Getting  rid of the signal interference during heat inversion season from  
Shreveport, LA is worth the trip and it will serve the audience that wants  
the format


(((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((((
 
Steve:
 
The inversions are an anomlie that exists with every station a few times a  
year.  The difference in the case with the present channel 101.1  vs.  the 
religious band is that the religious band does not have the milage  separation 
protection between 101.1 in Dallas and 101.1 in Shreveport.  No  one can violate 
those curves without major rule changes.
 
The religious band has a lot of overcrowded channels and alot of granted  
adjacent channel waivers.   New KVTT channel may be a 100 kW.  at  2349 ft. MSL 
equivalent to Cedar Hill tower tops but the frequency does not have  the milage 
protections that 101.1 does.  Is WRR Class C or C0 now? I  don't believe any 
tower will be built in the area above 2349 msl?  I don't  live there any 
longer so I am not up to date.
 
I believe Mr. Moncure and Mr. Hass are correct,  the only thing that  is 
equal is the e.r.p..
 
((((((((((((
 
 This is because a 
> commercial C has rights to the full boat,  100 kW @ 600 M, while the 
> noncomm has only rights to what it may now  have, which is 100 kW @ 335M, a 
> not inconsiderable difference in  elevation.
 
(((((((((((((((
 
Dave Hultsman
X WRR Technical Director
(Back when we had water cooled transmission lines)