[BC] PD's are timid
Donna Halper
dlh
Sun Sep 3 20:05:12 CDT 2006
it was said--
> >Didn't want to hear' had little to do with listeners. A decade ago I asked
> >the music director at a country station (where I worked as engineer) why a
> >certain new tune he liked wasn't on the playlist. He answered that the song
> >wasn't being promoted as a 'single' by the label, and we would not play it.
>
> >The weekly 'adds' list, I discovered, was purely a fiction created by the
> >labels. 'Music director' meant nothing.
And then there is the timidity of PDs in our conglomerate world. At
the risk of turning this into a political conversation, I was on the
air and music directing during the VietNam era. We absolutely did
play protest songs, even on top 40. Contrast that to today when in
the run up to the war in Iraq, a number of stations were told NOT to
air any anti-war songs (and no it's not an urban legend-- a PD friend
of mine showed me a memo). Recently, I asked another PD if he would
consider playing the new Dixie Chicks CD. He said he would never
play them even if they had a #1 song, because his listeners would be
furious. Certain songs are arbitrarily declared "off limits" because
some people might call in and complain? When I was music directing,
a little controversy was considered part of the job-- as long as the
song wasn't obscene and didn't drop the F bomb. These days,
auditorium tests, music tests, and other tests render most playlists
so bland and unremarkable that why would anyone listen? Good radio
should be compelling and exciting. I don't find a playlist with the
same 600 songs particularly interesting, even when it has lots of
liners claiming "we play what we want."
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list