[BC] Talk Radio losing influence?

[RichardBJohnson at comcast.net]

Many countries have a Department of Propaganda. The United States 
doesn't need one because the media publishes everything the 
Government provides. One can follow the path of discourse through the 
entire scheme. A large company needs to make more money or lay off 
workers. Its lobbyist visit congress and next we know there is an 
environmental study that shows that Boeing needs to re-engine the 
KC-135. NPR mysteriously picks this up as a reduction in greenhouse 
gasses and starts educating the masses to they are not opposed to 
spending more billions in the "Military Industrial Complex" that 
Eisenhower warned us about. Even the newspapers don't bother to tell 
us that Boeing needs some additional work between new airplane 
releases or else it will have to lay off workers. Instead, it parrots 
NPR's "study" with interspersed government "releases" to show how 
Boeing, with the government's help, is saving the planet. The cycle 
continues. Neither Limbaugh nor O'Reilly count. They just p!
  arrot w
hat they have been spoon-fed by the government to support their 
specialized "perspectives." The secret source approaches and says, 
"Hey! Wanna buy a watch?"


--
Cheers,
Richard B. Johnson
Read about my book
http://www.LymanSchool.org

  -------------- Original message ----------------------
From: Mike McCarthy <Towers at mre.com>
 > Many talk shows might be conservative Donna, but the media in general is
 > more liberally biased than many people conclude.  It's a background
 > thing.  One would not think NPR as being liberal until you actually listen
 > to the overall product they produce.  When you look over their raised noses
 > and stuffed shirt delivery,  the content is wildly liberal disguised as
 > high brow seemingly conservative discourse.