[BC] Fairness doctrine by another name? aka censorship?
Donna Halper
dlh at donnahalper.com
Mon Feb 16 22:03:06 CST 2009
At 08:37 PM 2/16/2009, Craig wrote:
>Donna,
>
>I have great respect for you and your experience but if more
>stations in a market carried the "other" side, the revenue
>potentially would be split very thing. So thin that the stations
>might have to drop them..
>If Ed does well against Sean, Bill, Gordon, etc. as the only
>alternative how will he do when there are three more
>alternatives. Air America did not do well and we can debate why but
>at the end of the day it was not popular.
Ed and Stephanie are not syndicated by Air America and they have no
relationship to it, other than being syndicated on stations that
carry some Air America shows. As a consultant, I believe that the
best talkers-- no matter what their politics-- will get an audience
if given a chance. And in a number of cities, Ed and Stephanie get an
audience, despite being on weaker signals. I like to see various
views, various styles of talk, and various entertaining talkers get a
chance. Limbaugh is entertaining and very good at what he does. So
are Ed and Stephanie. Talk radio is an art, and it's difficult to do
it well. I want to the best talkers to be heard, no matter what
their ideologies.
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list