[BC] The K- Word ( Power - Side )

Broadcast List USER Broadcast at fetrow.org
Wed Feb 25 22:37:18 CST 2009


Of course Barry knows this, and it is pretty insulting that you point  
this out.

On the other hand, this post will never make it to the list, because  
of the filter.

We all know Barry got this right.

No one will ever see this post because I am not willing to write  
several more paragraphs.

--chip

On Feb 25, 2009, at 6:00 AM, broadcast-request at radiolists.net wrote:

> Message: 15
> From: Glen Kippel <glen.kippel at gmail.com>
>
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Barry Mishkind  
> <barry at oldradio.com> wrote:
>
>> Well, you don't actually "move" the station's frequency.  The  
>> carrier stays
>> put.  But, it is a form of Single Sideband -- however it is not  
>> Single
>> Sideband, Suppressed Carrier, like hams use.  It certainly reduces  
>> sideband
>> splatter in the direction that the sideband is reduced.  If there  
>> is a
>> first-adjacent station close by with which you wish to not  
>> interfere, this
>> is the way to do it.
>>
>> At 11:56 AM 2/24/2009, tosenkowsky at prodigy.net wrote:
>>
>>> The pattern bandwidth will affect the
>>> readings, depending where you are,
>>> azimuth wise. This, in addition to the
>>> sideband relationship at the RF generation
>>> point.
>>>
>>
>>        Aren't there two reasons for power-side?
>>
>>        1. To "move" a station slightly up/down the dial.
>>            this is less useful on digital receivers.
>>
>>        2. To better match the sidebands into a DA.
>>            this may still be useful in some cases




More information about the Broadcast mailing list