[BC] QUESTION FOR THE "MIND" MASSES
Rich Wood
richwood
Wed Dec 7 11:12:16 CST 2005
------ At 07:28 PM 12/6/2005, Dave Schreyer wrote: -------
>How do you explain the necessity of IBOC for an AM talk radio station? Isn't
>digital radio better served for those stations who play music?
How often do you listen to talk radio? Agency commercials are usually
stereo. Jingles are usually stereo. Bumper and theme music is
generally stereo. Creative FM talk stations that have guests often
slightly pan the host and guest off center. The biggest problem is
talk hosts fighting for the far right channel. Talk stations often
run sports. Watch a ball game on TV in stereo. Turn it to mono and
see what a dramatic difference in excitement there is. For a creative
person there are many reasons for stereo Talk stations. I can't
recall seeing a relatively recent Talk installation that isn't
stereo. They may be running the system in mono but it's capable of
stereo with minor reprogramming. The infrastructure is there.
Remember, stereo (or binaural) is the natural order of things. When
they order children, every parent takes the two ears option.
WOR, New York, is one of the Talk stations that still has guests.
Stereo is perfect for them. In many cases there may be two guests.
Positioning them at different points in a soundstage makes a show
more interesting and easier to follow without having to reintroduce
each guest every time they speak.
>What a wonderfully DUMB idea to have high tech with AM talk radio!
>Since when does
>talk radio on AM need the fancy high tech quality of IBOC?
I find it hard to consider something that craps all over its
neighbors to be high tech. The saddest part of all this is that
there's a far more dramatic improvement in AM IBUZ than there is in
FM. FM's improvement is subtle and requires dropping decades old
habits of loudness. Once a General Manager tunes across the dial and
finds his competition is louder every engineer here knows the first
directive will be to make it louder. Except for the few Classical
stations left, gentle processing is an oxymoron.
>Who cares about why...its ludicrous!
Why? What's ludicrous is the damage IBUZ does to AM. What's ludicrous
is that AM stations are launching into it knowing how destructive it is.
Rich
Rich Wood
Rich Wood Multimedia
Phone: 413-303-9084
FAX: 413-480-0010
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list