[BC] HD AM radio versus AM Stereo

[Steve]

We tested the Kahn system at KFRC in San Francisco. During one of the tests
we went up into the Sierra's and even though our signal by then was iffy you
got it in stereo. That's what I liked about the Kahn system. If you could
get the signal it WAS in Stereo. The rest is history. Well at least we've
done one thing right (as far as I know and if I'm wrong please correct me)
the best system for FM Stereo was the one that won the prize and was
accepted by the FCC.

Steve


----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kevin Tekel" <amstereoexp at yahoo.com>
To: <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Sent: Saturday, December 24, 2005 10:28 PM
Subject: [BC] HD AM radio versus AM Stereo


> Willie wrote:
> > Exactly. I think Kahn's system was by far the superior system, but the $
> > did the talking, not the engineers. The big $ manufacturer had more $ to
> > throw around than Kahn did, so that's why the technically inferior
> > system won. Sound familiar? (IBUZ vs DRE/DRM)
>
> Leonard Kahn's biggest problem was, and still is, Leonard Kahn.  He's a
> brilliant engineer, but his ego is out of control.  Basically, he is the
> Ralph Nader of radio.
>
> Just one little example: if you have any kind of Kahn exciter, whether it
> is used for analog ISB AM Stereo, analog Power-Side, or digital "CAM-D",
> you must feed it with audio that has not been clipped or pre-emphasized.
> Why?  Because he takes care of those things by himself, inside the Kahn
> exciter.  Don't like the way that sounds on the air?  Your only choice is
> to take the Kahn exciter out of service.
>
>
>
>
>
>
> __________________________________
> Yahoo! for Good - Make a difference this year.
> http://brand.yahoo.com/cybergivingweek2005/
>
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
http://www.radiolists.net/