[BC] Your site in view

[DANA PUOPOLO]

Actually, Canada has a pretty accurate terrain model. They frequently base
station separations on terrain shielding: ie: two cochannel class A's need
only be 40 miles apart if there's a mountain range between them. They also
employ directional antennas for allocations, etc. All in all, their CRTC is
much more "enlightened" then our FCC.

-D


------ Original Message ------
Received: Mon, 09 May 2005 06:54:39 PM PDT
From: Robert Meuser <Robertm at broadcast.net>
To: Broadcast Radio Mailing List <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Subject: Re: [BC] Your site in view



WFIFeng at aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 05/09/2005 3:57:29 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
> robertm at broadcast.net writes:
> 
> 
>>That is not the case. Each case is different and you have to look at the 
>>engineering. 
> 
> 
> Of course.
> 
> 
>> Anyway, what is wrong with interference over land?  Deals have been made 
>>over interference for ages.
> 
> 
> Well, if that land is mostly uninhabitable desert, rocks, swamp, or 
> mountains, sure. :) Don't the Great Lakes have some pretty major population
centers 
> dotted along their shores?
> 
   Who cares?

_______________________________________________
This is the BROADCAST mailing list
To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
http://www.radiolists.net/