[BC] The Daytime Answer...
Mike McCarthy
Towers
Sun Nov 13 22:54:50 CST 2005
Then factoring the location within the band and ground conductivity, it's
really either WWJ or KMJ as best emitters.....
I can say with great certainly that KFAN doesn't get out really well
despite what the below would infer. My In-laws live near St. Cloud and
it's no where near like WCCO.
At 11:38 PM 11/13/2005 -0500, Robert Meuser wrote
>I will agree with peter, the CDBS is not completely correct in regards to
>WWJ. You also did not differentiate night and day which also makes a
>difference.
>
>R
>
>Golchert, Michael A. wrote:
>> Boy did this stir up a hornets nest of interesting comments....
>>After fighting with the CDBS (as Peter has alluded to) here's the
>>answer. (Please pardon the formatting)
>>
>>Call Freq. COL TPO Tws. Max mv/m @ 1km and
>>bearing.
>>WFLF 540 Pine Hills FL 50 4 4861 @ 75 degrees
>>KFBK 1530 Sacramento 50 2* 5360 @ 345
>>WALE 990 Greenville RI 50 6 5435 @ 140
>>KFAN 1130 St. Paul MN 50 6 6348 @ 15
>>KMJ 580 Fresno 50 4 6494 @ 270
>>WWJ 950 Detroit 50 5 6653 @ 355
>>KTLK 1150 Los Angles 50 5 7166 @ 245
>>WLQV 1500 Detroit 50 9 7382 @ 10
>>
>> * Note: KFBK uses 180 degree Franklin towers (I think). I'm certain
>>that Peter can confirm/deny this.
>>
>>If there are others, I'd love to hear about them. Note that this is
>>DAYTIME patterns only...I get the Night pattern summary done tomorrow.
>>
>>Michael A. Golchert
>>AM Field Engineer
>>Clear Channel
>>Life is Simple. Eat. Sleep. Make RF.
>>
>>_______________________________________________
>>This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>>To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>>For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
>>http://www.radiolists.net/
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
>http://www.radiolists.net/
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list