[BC] The Daytime Answer...

[Barry Mishkind]

At 09:55 PM 11/13/05, Mike McCarthy wrote
>Then factoring the location within the band and ground conductivity, 
>it's really either WWJ or KMJ as best emitters.....

         Maybe the chart should have one more column,
         with the local conductivity (not necessarily
         the M-3 number).

         ... or two ... the conductivity, and, perhaps,
         FI measurements at 10, 12.5 and 15 miles?

         That would give a better impression
         of what stations get out...


>I can say with great certainly that KFAN doesn't get out really well 
>despite what the below would infer.  My In-laws live near St. Cloud 
>and it's no where near like WCCO.
>
>At 11:38 PM 11/13/2005 -0500, Robert Meuser wrote
>>I will agree with peter, the CDBS is not completely correct in 
>>regards to WWJ. You also did not differentiate night and day which 
>>also makes a difference.
>>
>>R
>>
>>Golchert, Michael A. wrote:
>>>     Boy did this stir up a hornets nest of interesting comments....
>>>After fighting with the CDBS (as Peter has alluded to) here's the
>>>answer.  (Please pardon the formatting)
>>>
>>>Call    Freq.    COL            TPO    Tws.        Max mv/m @ 1km and
>>>bearing.
>>>WFLF 540    Pine Hills FL    50        4            4861 @ 75 degrees
>>>KFBK 1530   Sacramento    50        2*           5360 @ 345
>>>WALE 990    Greenville RI    50        6            5435 @ 140
>>>KFAN 1130    St. Paul MN    50        6            6348 @ 15
>>>KMJ    580    Fresno            50        4            6494 @ 270
>>>WWJ   950    Detroit            50        5            6653 @ 355
>>>KTLK   1150   Los Angles    50        5            7166 @ 245
>>>WLQV  1500  Detroit            50       9            7382 @ 10
>>>
>>>     * Note: KFBK uses 180 degree Franklin towers (I think).  I'm certain
>>>that Peter can confirm/deny this.
>>>
>>>If there are others, I'd love to hear about them.  Note that this is
>>>DAYTIME patterns only...I get the Night pattern summary done tomorrow.