[BC] More important: the Nighttime Answer

[DANA PUOPOLO]

DRM wasn't a consideration because it's essentially open source. Companies
NEED to make $$ from AM, otherwise how will they be able to pay off the FCC
and/or NAB?

-D



------ Original Message ------
Received: 
From: Rich Wood <richwood at pobox.com>
To: Broadcast Radio Mailing List <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Subject: Re: [BC] More important: the Nighttime Answer

------ At 11:34 AM 11/19/2005, Dave wrote: -------

>And if one is listening closely, the murmur seems to be sounding like what?
>I'm not asking for secrets here, just opinions.

I would guess it sounds like a heart murmur. If DRM solves the 
problem of interference, that would cause severe anxiety among those 
cornered by IBUZ. Will the current exciters use it (legally or 
otherwise) or will there be another expensive purchase? Will the 
current receivers (wherever they are) have to be redesigned?

Rich 


_______________________________________________
This is the BROADCAST mailing list
To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists:
http://www.radiolists.net/