[BC] RE: NPR violation of 73.1206?

[Kevin/Tieline Technology]

Agreed!  I was referring only to call outs which is what the original
post was about, *not* call in situations.  And I only mentioned the
strange Indiana law (an apparent law since I'm not a lawyer) for
discussion and was not meant to set off alarm bells.  If 2 lawyers that
I trust have told me it's OK to record phone conversations there must be
something there though I am still suspicious of that apparent law.  But
it's off topic a bit anyway since it does not apply to any radio
situation.

Kevin Webb


>Not so Kevin,

>The rule which Harold has repeatedly cited allows for implied consent
when 
>the non-station caller initiates the call and the call is made to a 
>location in which the call is likely to be aired or recorded.  Such as
a 
>studio line or news tip line.

>MM

>At 03:30 PM 11/25/2005 -0500, Dennis Cope wrote
>>What happens when during a live show the caller is calling in to get
on >the
>>air?
>>
>>We have a show on one of my stations called "Swap Shop", people call
is to
>>put their
>>"stuff/junk" on the air hoping some one listening will buy it from
them.
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>By the way what I mentioned below is assuming a recording to be aired
>>later which is what it sounded like in the NPR case.  One must always
>>get permission off the air before placing that person on the air.
>>Period.  No question about it.
>>
>>Kevin Webb