[BC] This is Part 15 Radio :)

[Robert Meuser]

I can not see a reason why not. The only thing with part 15 AM stuff is that you 
have to work at it with good equipment if you want any kind of coverage. Also I 
would follow the rules to the letter if I had a part 73 licensed station.

R

KKTY wrote:
> Ok, now I read the story on the Georgia station the other day, and my wheels
> are spinning.
> 
> I lose an important community west of here when I power down at night. Could
> I drop in a Part 15 there on my same frequency and rebroadcast my regular
> signal? Could I drop in the Part 15 on the same freq & do localized
> programming? Could a directional put a part 15 in it's null to hit a lost
> community at night? Could Willie put in a couple of Part 15's on 1500 & get
> night service?
> 
> Basic question is, can I use a Part 15 as an AM translator? How many of
> these could be daisy-chained, and to cover how big of an area?
> 
> 
> Dennis Switzer
> KKTY AM/FM
> Douglas, WY
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Rev. Robert P. Chrysafis" Sent: Wednesday, February 01, 2006 1:23 PM
> Subject: [BC] This is Part 15 Radio :)
> 
> 
> 
>>Check out these part 15 stations
>>
>>kieth said this guy is using 12 rangemaster each being fed by 8k telco
> 
> lines
> 
>>http://www.rbr.com/epaper/pages/january06/06-20_news1.html
>>
>>not as big but still running a nice setup
>>http://www.wnar-am.com
>>
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: http://www.radiolists.net/
>