[BC] Mom & Pop Stations endangered?
Jay Braswell
braswell
Wed Feb 15 10:28:17 CST 2006
Excellent point.
What "it" is, is this...there is an incredibly thin line between
being a passionate, community-oriented broadcaster, who also is a
good business person. I know of very few, these days.
What you mostly have, are the "show me the money" operators, who
could care less if they're selling cars, shoes, pork belly futures or
advertising. The concept of running a news department at a loss (like
Bill Paley at CBS did) because it's the "right" thing to do, while
making the dollars to support everything from spots in "Dallas" and
"All In The Family", is totally and completely foreign concept to the
money guys. Sure, make money from the avails, but also make money
from EVERYTHING else, or...quit doing it...that's how they all look at it.
On the other hand, you have those folks who have what I call a
"public radio" mentality. It's ALL about service to the community,
with quality programming and top-notch news and public affairs. These
are the people who believe that "the community" is required to
support the radio station. These are the folks who are always running
around praising the concept of LPFM, LPAM, and the "I have a right to
access the "public" airwaves" horse hockey.
These diametrically opposed ways of thinking, both lead to eventual
failure. All the griping about how the mega-groups are running
listeners to satellite, internet and I-Pods, have a great deal of
truth to them. What these folks are doing, is akin to picking every
ear of corn from the stalk, but never irrigating, fertilizing or
replanting next year. Sooner, rather than later, all that sweet corn
is gonna be gone, and there won't be nothin' in the field but rotting
and dead stalks.
The second group also fails, because of that "the world owes me a
living" mentality.
At the top, I mentioned that the combination good
broadcaster/business person are few, and they are. They stick to
workable ideals...their stations do local news, and are as heavily
involved in their communities, as much as is financially prudent.
They utilize the available tools to be able to afford to keep the
stations operating, and they fully understand that they must EARN
their income from the businesses, by giving a return on the
advertisers' investment. If you get the customers to the door, and
prove that you did it, money is really no object...in most cases.
You must prioritize running the business first, then go about serving
the community. Of course, the really good operators figure a way to
do both, simultaneously
Like I said...it's a very thin line.
>>the costs involved in starting and running a radio station.
>>the GM told me how you just could
>>not make them understand that it cost 10 times more to start and run a radio
>>station than it did to put out a small town weekly and we reached people who
>>probably never read newspapers.
>As an advertiser, I care about two things :
>1. My ego.
>2. How many potential members of my target market will I reach
> per my advertising dollar ?
>I don't give a rip what it costs to run a radio station.
>Just show me value for *my* dollar.
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list