[BC] Re: AM daytimers

[Robert Meuser]

Don't take Dan too seriously (or personally). He is one of those gifted 
in answering a simple question with five or more tedious paragraphs, 
certainly no Phil Alexander or Richard Fry or even Peter Haas.

That being said, you should at least condsider that nit picky point he 
made. If you want your site to have the proper degree of credibility, it 
should properly reflect what a class D station really is, which is 
really determined the RF voltage produced at 1 km.   Power does not have 
much to do with it. You could have a station with less than 250 watts 
into a tall tower being fully class B. On the other hand, it is a least 
theoretically possible to have more than 250 watts into an inefficient 
antenna and be class B.

I think you would want your site to correctly reflect class D stations. 
I am sure you would not want to have info about a station that shows up 
as being class B in the FCC database.

R



Radiofldude at aol.com wrote:

>Dan Strassberg wrote:
>"take a look at your high-school algebra book--if you can find  it."
> 
>My reply:
> 
>That remark CLEARLY takes a shot at my intelligence and I don't appreciate  
>it.
> 
>This is going to be my site and if thats how i wish to classify daytimers,  
>thats how I will classify them.
>
>_______________________________________________
>This is the BROADCAST mailing list
>To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
>For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: http://www.radiolists.net/
>
>  
>