[BC] Re: WGN and IBUZ

Rich Wood richwood
Thu Jun 1 08:49:38 CDT 2006


------ At 10:01 PM 5/31/2006, Xmitters at aol.com wrote: -------

>WGN has very good audio again now that IBOC is shut off. I don't know if the
>bandwidth is any wider, but it is definitely cleaner. It's a breath of fresh
>air to hear their clean audio without that IBOC grass (iGRASS) in the
>background. Sorry about your experiment, dude :-( I'm disappointed 
>too. No idea why
>it's turned off or for how long. I'll try to find out.

If anyone knows why I'd be curious. I used to work for Tribune when 
they owned WPIX-FM, New York (now WQCD). Maybe I'll just call and 
ask. With just a single station they really have no vested interest 
in the system and, I'll bet, were concerned about the analog quality.

I'm strangely disappointed that a perfect test of IBUZ's effect on 
TSL isn't possible until they turn it back on. If I were the GM or PD 
I'd be extremely careful not to do anything to give WGCI and 
advantage. WGN's claim on #1 is tenuous. Recent PD changes might have 
something to do with it.

Rich 



More information about the Broadcast mailing list