[BC] 50 kW DA Coverage
WFIFeng@aol.com
WFIFeng
Fri Jun 2 19:09:21 CDT 2006
In a message dated 06/02/2006 3:34:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time,
Robertm at broadcast.net writes:
> If you are correct, then it was a bad DA design. Look at their present
> three tower DA and then overlay the 50 KW KMJ 4 tower pattern, and you
> will see that moving towards the sides of the lobe the fields would have
> been maintained at about what they now are at 5 KW. I just can not find
> anything east that would be a limitation. Besides, if it were a coverage
> issue, why would Salem (the company that filed for the CP) have it
> extended a number of times? That would tell me they liked what they saw.
I don't see how KMJ would have much impact on WMCA- being as they are on
opposite coasts. It's been a while since I saw the actual maps, I just remember a
*lot* of the 50Kw signal going out to sea, and most of the signal into CT
going away. Personally, I was hoping that they *would* do it, because their format
is very similar to ours. ;)
Willie...
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list