[BC] 50 kW DA Coverage

[Robert Meuser]

Willie:

PLEASE!!!   I was just giving you a what if. Visualize please.

R

WFIFeng at aol.com wrote:
> In a message dated 06/02/2006 3:34:15 PM Eastern Daylight Time, 
> Robertm at broadcast.net writes:
> 
>> If you are correct, then it was a bad DA design. Look at their present 
>>  three tower DA and then overlay the 50 KW KMJ 4 tower pattern, and you 
>>  will see that moving towards the sides of the lobe the fields would have 
>>  been maintained at about what they now are at 5 KW.  I just can not find 
>>  anything east that would be a limitation. Besides, if it were a coverage 
>>  issue, why would Salem (the company that filed for the CP) have it 
>>  extended a number of times?  That would tell me they liked what they saw.
> 
> I don't see how KMJ would have much impact on WMCA- being as they are on 
> opposite coasts. It's been a while since I saw the actual maps, I just remember a 
> *lot* of the 50Kw signal going out to sea, and most of the signal into CT 
> going away. Personally, I was hoping that they *would* do it, because their format 
> is very similar to ours. ;)
> 
> Willie...
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This is the BROADCAST mailing list
> To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
> For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: http://www.radiolists.net/
>