[BC] Public File proceeding

[David Tillotson]

I hope you took a few minutes to express these thoughts in comments to the 
FCC.  If you haven't yet, here's how to do so:

The link to the web page for filing comments is: 
http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/upload_v2.cgi  Just copy it and paste it 
in the address bar of your browser.  Then enter the rulemaking proceeding 
number RM-11332 in the box 1 at the upper left, fill in the other required 
boxes, scroll to the bottom and either browse to select the comments that 
you have written and saved in Word or Wordperfect,   select the document 
format, and send the attached file, or scroll further down and type in your 
comments and then send.

If you want to look at comments that have been filed, or to review the RM 
petition, use this link http://gullfoss2.fcc.gov/prod/ecfs/comsrch_v2.cgi, 
type in RM-11332 in box 1 and hit enter.

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Larry Fuss" <lfuss2 at cox.net>
To: "'Broadcasters' Mailing List'" <broadcast at radiolists.net>
Sent: Tuesday, June 13, 2006 11:22 AM
Subject: RE: [BC] Public File proceeding


> Useless paperwoirk???!!

The Public & Broadcasting Manual is useless and out of date.  The Issues &
Programs lists are a farce.
So tell me, what in the file actually serves a useful purpose?  The
ownership report? It's available
online.  The employment report? Same.  Letters from the public? Yea, right.

> FIRST, we allow stations to move out of their city of license without as
much
as a mail stop there. (If you think that 'toll free' numbers cut it, try
this
- pick 10 stations at random that aren't in their city of license and then
try
to find their 'free' numbers. I'll give you 4:1 odds you can't find half of
them!).

But what does that have to do with the Public File?  Why not just enforce
that rule?

> THEN we virtually get rid of all news and public affairs programming.

How does maintaining a Public File change that?

> NOW you want to eliminate the last connection to the PUBLIC - where at
least
the public can come and SEE what said station ISN'T doing for them.

What public?  I've been in radio for 34 years.  In that entire period of
time, the
only person who ever came to one of my stations wanting to see the Public
File, other
than an FCC inspector, was my ex-wife.  She thought there was going to be
financial
information in there that she could use against me.  (Everybody knows that
all radio
station owners are just rolling in money, right?)

On the other hand, I've been to many stations over the years and asked to
see their
Public Files.  Most were a joke.  Very few had all the required material,
and most
had lots of junk that shouldn't have been in there at all, including
privileged communications
from their FCC attorneys, lists of contest winners, copies of every PSA they
ever aired,
instruction manuals for cart machines, maintenance records for the station
van, etc.  It
really is a joke.

> C'mon guys! This is Bull**it!

Yes, it really is.  As I said before, stations should be held accountable to
certain rules.
I still hear stations, even in big markets, that don't seem to understand
what constitutes
a legal ID.  I observe AM stations operating at night with day power and/or
pattern.  And
as you mentioned above, there are stations far from the city-of-license with
no published
phone number in the COL.  Enforce THOSE rules rather than put stations
through a useless
paperwork exercise.

Larry Fuss


_______________________________________________
This is the BROADCAST mailing list
To send to the list, email: broadcast at radiolists.net
For sub changes, archives and info on this other lists: 
http://www.radiolists.net/