[BC] Re: Public File Proceeeding
Barry Mishkind
barry
Sun Jun 25 16:23:03 CDT 2006
At 01:47 PM 6/25/2006, RokprtMike at aol.com wrote
>Since your friend didn't bother to notify the FCC of the situation,
>it is quite likely the FCC only had the statements of the station at
>hand to use. Without a lot more manpower ($$$$) from Congress, and a
>mandate that includes MANY things besides broadcasting, they are
>hobbled and unable to inspect everyone.
>
>Hi Barry,
>
>He actually considered it but it the station belongs to his town so if he
>reported them and the FCC fined them the fine would have been paid with tax
>dollars.
>
>The point I was trying to make was the fact that they didn't have a public
>file, and still don't, appeared as an exhibit it their renewal application.
>
>Mike
That is a sad truth in many places. Bureaucrats
dodge responsibility. Tax dollars pay fines
and judgements. It happens mostly
because there is no "media" to expose it.
At any rate, that didn't prevent him from
contacting the real owners ... the city.
Who knows, either the situation might have
been fixed, or the bad guys even "reassigned."
More information about the Broadcast
mailing list